June 2012
162 posts
I still don’t quite see how you link skeuomorphism will Ballard, could you elaborate on that a little more?
I’m thinking, as you ask, of what Martin Amis said of Ballard, that he ‘seems to address a different – a disused – part of the reader’s brain’. Ballard often writes of tapping into the ‘archaeopsychic zero’: the primordial self, our common corporeal memory as a species.
I wonder if there’s a relationship to be drawn between skeuomorphism and Ballard’s often very singular use of metaphor?
Not the kind of memory you have as an individual, but that which we all possess, insofar as our bodies and minds are records of our species’ evolution. To that extent, Ballard was overtly interested in skeuomorphic processes long before I’d heard of the concept.
What Jung would call “collective unconscious” then?
That’s the model Ballard used for understanding the skeuomorphic; he took the idea directly from Jung. But it wasn’t really adequate to explain the material world; sufficient for the human mind, but not for the made environment of technology.
This has similarities with Stiegler’s tertiary retention as well.
“Consciousness is thus a network of inter-connected and multi-layered circuitry, ranging from the unconscious to the history – the memory – of “culture itself” (what Stiegler calls “tertiary retentions”).”
It’s something Stiegler develops from Husserl regarding technology as a form of memory.
I interviewed Ray Kurzweil recently & he was adamant that his mobile phone was effectively his memory.
Certainly that’s true for McLuhanist’s like Kurzweil, though the instrumentalism implicit in such reasoning is a problem, for me. He’d still see technology as a set of devices in a master/slave relation. The Kurzweil thing is nothing new.
Merlin McDonald in “Origins of the Modern Mind” linked the act of writing a diary to ESS (External Symbolic Storage). The placing of memory into external sources.
Oh, that’s interesting: a kind of ‘exteriorization’ of mind in the social. It sounds quite similar to the extended mind thesis - except this argues for cognitive and epistemic parity between states and processes inside and outside of the skin bag.
Of course it’s nothing new, but it could be argued the widespread use of mobile phones ups the stakes somewhat.
I like what Mark Fisher has to say about smartphones particularly. At Virtual Futures, he described them as libidino-electrical parasites. And that’s a much more balanced view than the instrumentalism of Kurzweil; or at least it takes into account the fact that such devices are not ‘innocent’, that their very design carries a predetermined set of ‘habits’ over into our behaviour.
The database industry has benefited immensely from the seminal work on data theory started in the 1970s. This work changed the world and continues to be very relevant, but it is apparent now that it captures only part of the problem. We need a new theory and taxonomy of data that must include: • Identity and versions. Unlocked data comes with identity and optional versions. • Derivation. Which versions of which objects contributed to this knowledge? How is their schema interpreted? Changes to the source would drive a recalculation just as in Excel. If a legal reason means the source data may not be used, you should forget about using the knowledge derived from it. • Lossyness of the derivation. Can we invent a bounding that describes the inaccuracies introduced by derived data? Is this a multidimensional inaccuracy? Can we differentiate loss from the inaccuracies caused by sheer size? • Attribution by pattern. Just like a Mulligan stew, patterns can be derived from attributes that are derived from patterns (and so on). How can we bound taint from knowledge that we are not legally or ethically supposed to have? • Classic locked database data. Let’s not forget that any new theory and taxonomy of data should include the classic database as a piece of the larger puzzle. It’s a great time to be working with data. Lots of new and exciting things are happening!
Q” —If You Have Too Much Data, then “Good Enough” Is Good Enough - ACM Queue
The Automatypewriter is a typewriter that can type by itself:
It can also detect what’s being typed on it. It can be used to send text to and/or receive text from a computer via USB. It was designed as a platform for playing interactive fiction games